Welcome to American Family Association
About Us | AFA Products | Contact Us | Donate | Media 
AFA.net - America's Premier Pro-Family Action Web Site!
Click here to return to main page
AFA Issues
Special Projects
AFA Divisions
AFA Activism
AFA Resources
AFA Services
Search the Site
 

AFA Activism

Current Action Alert

True Cloning Ban Passes Judiciary Committee

Attempt to add "Clone and Kill" language fails

email this page to a friendE-mail this page to a friend
July 25, 2001

Dear AFA Alert team,

A bill to ban human cloning is coming up before the House very soon. We need your help in support of this bill. Here is some background information and a fact sheet on the cloning issue:

Congressman Weldon's H.R. 2505 passed the full Judiciary Committee by a vote of 18-11. No amendments were added to the bill, and we expect it to come to the floor soon.

The attempt to change the bill into a "Clone and Kill" bill that would allow human cloning, just so the human embryos are killed before implantation, failed by a 19-11 vote.

Cloning Fact Sheet

» Download Cloning Fact Sheet in PDF format «

Summary:
The cloning of any human being is morally and ethically wrong. Cloning humans for birth or for harmful research should both be opposed. Cloning of DNA or cells or anything else that does not create a new human life is acceptable.

Status:
Two groups are working on cloning human beings for live birth. One group claims it will be able to do so within the next 18 to 24 months. Advanced Cell Technology in the U.S. is pursuing human cloning as a way to make embryos to use in destructive experiments.

Objections to Human Cloning:
  • Cloning of humans would require the prolific creation and destruction of human life in order to finally create a fully developed human clone. New humans would be created and destroyed in massive numbers for scientific research. Even many proponents of embryonic stem cell research have not advocated for the creation of new human embryos solely for research.
  • Human cloning represents a degree of power and control over the physical identity of other persons that violates their rights and demeans their unique individuality.
  • Cloning would make human life a commodity, created to preset specifications, thereby lessening respect for the value of human life.
  • Cloning humans would create a new category of biological relationship that presents serious personal, familial and societal difficulties. Who would be the "parents" of cloned humans? Who would be legally and morally responsible for them?

Definition:
Cloning is a way of producing a genetic twin of an organism, without sexual reproduction. The method used to produce Dolly the sheep is called "somatic cell nuclear transfer": the nucleus of a body cell ("somatic cell") is transferred into an unfertilized egg whose nucleus has been removed or rendered inactive. A tiny electric pulse may then stimulate development of the resulting embryo, which is an almost exact genetic twin of the creature that supplied the nucleus.


Two Opposite Approaches to Banning Human Cloning

True Ban on Human Cloning (H.R. 2505 Weldon) AFA Supports
This approach would prohibit using the cloning technique to create a new human life. Cloning of DNA and cells and anything else that does not create a new living human organism would be acceptable under this approach.

Ban on Implantation of Cloned Humans (H.R. 2172 Greenwood) AFA Opposes
This approach would allow the cloning technique to be used to create human life for the purpose of destroying that life in research. The only requirement would be that the cloned human is not allowed to be implanted in a uterus. This approach has been called "Clone and Kill" because it would allow human life to be created and manipulated as long as science can support it, just so the life is destroyed before implantation.

This approach would for the first time allow the creation of human life while making it a federal offense to let that life continue.

Endorsing the creation of human life solely for the purpose of destroying it would be a new step backward in the protection of human life.

This approach would also be completely unenforceable. Once cloned embryo farms are created, it will be impossible to control whether or not any of those embryos are implanted for live birth.

Abortion and Roe v. Wade
This is an issue of protecting human life and respecting human nature. Some would want to make this into an abortion issue, but it is not. Since cloning happens outside the body, Roe v. Wade does not come into play. In fact, those who want to draw the line at banning the implantation of clones are the ones most likely to run afoul of Roe v. Wade. What would the remedy be for someone who broke the law by implanting a cloned human being? Would the law require an abortion? By contrast, at least ten states restrict or prohibit harmful experiments on embryos in the laboratory without infringing on Roe v. Wade.

Destroying human embryos for stem cell research
Destroying human embryos for research is reprehensible, but neither approach to banning human cloning would address the issue of federal funding for embryo-destroying stem cell research. The current stem cell debate is over whether or not human IVF embryos can be destroyed for research; the cloning debate is over whether or not new human life can be created for the purpose of scientific tests and then destroyed by government mandate.

Dolly was Number 277
To produce one live sheep, "Dolly," scientists created 277 sheep embryos; 276 died in different stages of development or were discarded. Experiments in human cloning would involve the creation and destruction of human life, at many stages, on a massive scale. Human lives are not acceptable scientific guinea pigs; a mistake making a human clone is not the same as a mistake copying an article at the copy machine.


Poll - (Time/CNN, February 7-8, 2001)
  • 67% thought it was a bad idea to clone animals.
  • 90% thought it was a bad idea to clone humans.
  • 68% thought it was a bad idea to clone humans for vital organs that can be used to save the lives of others.
  • 76% thought helping infertile couples to have children would not justify human cloning.
Brain Teasers
  • Who would be the clone's parents since there is no genetic "father" and "mother" in the usual sense?


  • Who would be legally responsible for a cloned human being or groups of cloned human beings?


  • Who would be legally, morally responsible if something went wrong with a clone?

  • Who would those deemed to be the responsible parties be responsible to?


  • What kind of rights would a clone have?


  • Could a clone sue the responsible parties that cloned him or her?


  • Would it be legally permissible to kill a cloned human if he or she were found to be "defective" after birth?


  • If you allow human cloning, but ban implantation of a human clone (by far the quickest and easiest part of the cloning process), what would be the legal remedy if a woman broke that law and implanted a clone?


  • Would it be legal to keep a cloned human embryo alive for a longer time outside the womb and develop parts of this human life for harvesting?


  • At what point does a cloned human have rights (life, protection from scientific experimentation, protection from crime, etc...)


  • Is that point different from what it would be for human life created the old fashioned way? If so, why?

Will Cloning Lead to:
  • the cloning of organ donors who would be mutilated or destroyed for the benefit of others?


  • the genetic creation of a human-animal hybrid [chimera] race?


  • the custom design of specialized human beings with gene sequences that make them better suited for combat situations or dangerous environments?


  • the design of a genetically superior, super-race?


  • the elimination of genetically distinct groups of human beings who are genetically inferior?



ACTION NEEDED

Since we expect this vote to come to the floor very soon, we need to have an all out push to defeat a Greenwood approach and support the Weldon bill.

Please act on this message from the House Pro-Life Caucus. Please call YOUR representative and ask for a vote FOR H.R. 2505 and AGAINST the "clone and kill" Greenwood bill, H.R. 2172.

There are some good talking points in the above factsheet. Please use them for letters to the editor and opinion editorials for your local newspapers.

Download a copy of this factsheet (PDF format) to your printer. You can copy it and pass it out to those in your constituency.



 
Subscribe...FREE!
Sign-up to receive AFA Action Alerts by e-mail.
Email address:
Your name:

Recent Action Alerts

AFA footer logo
copyright ©2006 American Family Association | privacy policy
AFA.net is designed specially to be used by 4.0 browsers and above.
If you are using an older version, you may download the latest free
by clicking the following: Internet Explorer and/or Netscape Navigator