Search AFA

My Twitter Dialogue with Charles C.W. Cooke of National Review

Monday, April 27, 2015 @ 10:33 AM
My Twitter Dialogue with Charles C.W. Cooke of National Review Bryan Fischer Host of "Focal Point" MORE

On Saturday, I had the privilege of engaging in a lengthy Twitter discussion with Charles C. W. Cooke, a writer for the nominally conservative National Review online. You can see our discussion on his Twitter feed here

Two things are striking to me about our dialogue. One is that a website as conservative as National Review claims to be would feature a writer who so aggressively supports the entire homosexual agenda. He considers the views of those of us in the pro-family movement to be “abhorrent.” With friends like these... 

Second, he has little or nothing to say in reply to the facts and the research I bring forward. His strategy, when he has no answer, is to change the subject. 

The discussion began when I explained to someone else on Twitter that the Republican Party came into being to fight two battles: “to prohibit...those twin relics of barbarism, polygamy and slavery.” Thus the GOP was founded to fight for the protection of one-man, one-woman marriage. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

So, by all means find Fischer’s views on homosexuality abhorrent. I do myself. But let’s not accuse him of “lying” when he’s not. (Note: he wrote this in response to the accusation that I was lying when I said the GOP was founded to protect one-man, one-woman marriage.) 

Seamus

It appears support of homosexuality has creeped in to the conservative ranks. Misguided, at best.@charlescwcooke@BryanJFischer 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke@SeamusTx The normalization of homosexuality should be opposed on public health grounds alone. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer@SeamusTx Do you hope to ban alcohol? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke@SeamusTx No. Drinking in moderation is not a risk to public health, but drunkenness is, e.g. while driving. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer@SeamusTx Should we outlaw consensual drunkenness in the home? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke@SeamusTx Nope, but we shouldn't celebrate it either. Leads to domestic abuse and destroyed lives. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke Since health risks are similar, our public policies toward substance abuse and homosexuality should be similar. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer And those should be . . .? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke Let's consult with the leading experts in helping people overcome substance abuse and learn from them. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer What is your view on the private ownership of firearms? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke Same as the Founders. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer What about the 30,000 people per year who die from suicide (two thirds) and murder (one third)? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke If folks are bent on suicide, they will find a way, guns or no guns. You want to ban the private ownership of rope? 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer Point is, other organizations say there’s no good side to alcohol or firearms. You’re putting your finger on the scale. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke Drinking in moderation is fine. Firearms are for self-protection. But Homosexual behavior is self destructive. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke People protect themselves every day in their homes from lethal assault with a privately-owned gun. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer True. That's the upside, among others. There's upsides to drinking too. But you don't factor any in with homosexuality.

 bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke That's because there is no "upside" in homosexual behavior, any more than there is in IV drug abuse. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer Except for the liberty and happiness of millions of people. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke But the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association says LGBTers are at elevated risks of anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer I’m tempted to say that your sort don’t help with that. But either way, that’s not an invitation to deny them liberty. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke The same problems exist in Scandinavian countries where homosexual behavior has been celebrated for decades. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke@charlescwcooke

@BryanJFischer You seem to believe that this is a choice? Is that a fair assessment of your position? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer@BryanJFischer 

@charlescwcooke Sexual behavior, except for victims of rape, is always a matter of choice. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer 88,000 people a year die from excessive alcohol use. 30,000 from firearms abuse. How many from homosexuality? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke You can check with the CDC on that. Men die tragically every day from HIV/AIDS, acquired from having sex with other men. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer How many? You said it was similar to alcohol. What's the number? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke CDC: "An estimated 13,712 people with an AIDS diagnosis died in 2012," total since epidemic began: 658,507. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer On its face that's one-sixth of the alcohol-related deaths. And how many of them contracted it through gay sex? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke What, in your view, is an acceptable number of deaths caused by men having sex with other men? For me, the answer is zero. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer Except in extreme cases, I think that people must be free to make their choices and to face the consequences. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke I agree. But that doesn't mean we should give society's highest endorsement to self-destructive behavior. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer I will note for the record that you didn't answer my question. Also, again, you seem to apply this standard inconsistently. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke My view is entirely consistent. As a matter of public policy, we should not celebrate any behavior that is self-destructive. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer That, of course, is because you disapprove of homosexuality. That's fine. But playing the externalities game is dishonest. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke I disapprove of homosexuality for the same reasons I oppose intrvenous drug abuse, the 2nd highest risk factor for HIV/AIDS. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer What is "society's highest endorsement"? 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke Calling marriage based on the "infamous crime against nature" the equivalent of natural marriage. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke@charlescwcooke

@BryanJFischer I’m tempted to say that your sort don’t help with that. But either way, that’s not an invitation to deny them liberty. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer@BryanJFischer 

@charlescwcooke No one is denying them liberty. The problem is the insistence of the gay lobby that society approve of what they do. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer You keep flitting between society and the state. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer@BryanJFischer

@charlescwcooke There is no difference when the state demands that all of society approve of homosexuality. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer Okay. We’re going around in circles. As I say, all you’re arguing is that you see no value in one but do in the others. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke And I am saying biology, genetics, social research and the laws of nature and nature's God should be our guide. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer If this is to be our standard we will end up subjugating our liberty to the latest studies. This is not how America works. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke Our policies should be guided by the laws of nature and nature's God. Research simply confirms what God has already said. 

charlescooktwitter.pngCharles C. W. Cooke

@BryanJFischer That’s putting your hand on the scales. We’re just going around in circles. I’ll wish you a good Saturday and duck out. 

bfischtwitter.jpgBryan Fischer

@charlescwcooke And may you have a good Saturday as well! 

 

SHOW COMMENTS
Please Note: We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the content. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at the author or other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved.

CONNECT WITH US

Find us on social media for the latest updates.

SUPPORT AFA

MAKE A DONATION Donor Related Questions: DONORSUPPORT@AFA.NET

CONTACT US

P.O. Drawer 2440 Tupelo, Mississippi 38803 662-844-5036 FAQ@AFA.NET
Copyright ©2017 American Family Association. All rights reserved.